zarx said:
doubt it
Why would they use a modified 6670 when a 7970m uses less power and is at least twice as powerful? If they want a low power chip going for a low end desktop GPU is stupid when the low power low heat mobile GPUs exist.
| Model |
Launch |
Code name |
Transistors (Million) |
Memory (MiB) |
Clock rate |
Config core |
Fillrate |
Fillrate |
Memory |
Memory |
Memory |
GFLOPS |
TDP3 (W) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pixel (GP/s) |
Texture (GT/s) |
Bandwidth (GB/s) |
type |
Bus width (bit) |
|
|
| Radeon HD 7950M |
Q4 2011[98] |
Thames Pro[79] |
|
2048 |
700 |
1409:28:32 |
24.3 |
71.7 |
155 |
GDDR5 |
256 |
1749 |
50 |
| Radeon HD 7970M |
Q4 2011[98] |
Thames XT[79] |
|
2048 |
800 |
1537:36:32 |
28.7 |
87.4 |
172 |
GDDR5 |
256 |
2017 |
65 |
| Radeon HD 6670 |
4/19/2011 |
Turks |
716 |
512/1024 |
800 |
480:24:08 |
6.4 |
19.2 |
64 |
GDDR5 |
128 |
768 |
66 |
| Xenos (Xbox 360) |
11/22/2005 |
R500, C1 |
232 |
512 (shared) 10 eDRAM |
500 |
48:16:08 |
4 |
8 |
22.4 (256EDRAM) |
GDDR3 |
128 |
240 |
|
|
They're probably aiming to make a good profit at launch.