I don't even game on PC at all anymore yet this article is ridiculous. The exact same article was written when the snes was coming out, then the PS1 coming out, then the PS2 coming out, then the PS3 coming out. The article seems to make the assumption that the ONLY progress from improved technological abilities is graphics.
It also makes one of the stupidest comments I've ever seen. To quote it word for word
''Here's a neat little formula for you to chew on, PC snobs: the better games look, the fewer they'll become and the less interesting they'll be''
Hear that everyone? If a game looks good it will be less interesting. This isn't a loose connection this is an ABSOLUTE fact! Game looks good? Bah it's not interesting. It's such a weird thing to say. There's nothing preventing games from looking good and being interesting. Will it be harder to make big budget games? Yes.... but so don't make a big budget game. Make a PSN or XBLA game to be experimental.
I mean going by the articles logic then why aren't we still just using NES levels of power? As it is there are still plenty of extra things that can be accomplished through having more power.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
