Not a fan of this thread, really. I'll just give this parting shot.
I think that most people look at a console and see if it has a few games that they will like to play. I doubt anybody buys a 360 for Ms. Splosion Man (though it is an EXCELLENT GAME) or a PS3 for Pixel Junk Shooter. That's just an awesome treat after you've already made the purchase. When you look at the console, you look at the totality of the library. Witcher 2 is on the PC? That doesn't mean you suddenly can't play it for your 360. DCU Online? Same goes for that game. Console mult-plats, too. Call of Duty on PS3 doesn't suddenly mean Call of Duty suddenly isn't on 360. You just look at what you can play vs. what you can't play.
It comes down to whether you'd rather play with Move or Kinect. Whether a dozen games in a lot of areas like LBP, Uncharted, and inFamous are more important to you than a few games in certain key genres like Gears, Forza, or Fable. It comes down to the "system sellers". Are a few blockbusters more important that a lot of variety? Are those blockbusters enough and can 3rd party titles pad out the library?
Man, my thoughts aren't really focused at all with this post. I'm sleepy. I'll try again, later.
Essay Pro