Why doesnt Sony charge for PSN membership?

[mjk45]

Millenium said:

PlaystaionGamer said:

Millenium said:

PlaystaionGamer said:

Millenium said:
Because then they'd have to upgrade PSN to make it worth it.

And then they couldn't share Publishers fees anymore for releasing demo's and stuff.

its weird... PSN and Live are the same as it is

Sorry my friend, but this time we'll have to agree to disagree, IMO psn isn't on par.

i actually agree with you!
PSN has more dedicated survers and allows games like LittleBigPlanet to able to run on the platform.... which they cant on live due to microsoft wanting to keep control over... well nothing. glad i get the better online and its free..

i guess PSN isnt on par.. its far above it. not opinion though, just factual stuff :)

Guess we'll have to agree to disagree some more

Instead of generalising about the service by saying " imo psn isn't on par" and  I'll have to disagree , tell us why it isn't on par  and are the differences  worth the price, to me the simple answer to your attitude would be, its more to do with I have a 360 and play on live and that's my preference , than the actual differences real or imagined of the two networks , same can be applied in reverse to those who  PS3/PSN is the platform of choice.