Stefl1504 said:
Well then I made some posts that were bound to be questioned by him, when he did the expected thing (asking questions) my suspicion was slightly reduced, after rethinking again, I would trust linkzmax to be a good enough player to look through my intentions, which then made me worry again (at first I thought it might just be that my intention was too obvious) I actually had a lot of post mentioning a FoS or HoS, but after my earlier meltdown I really thought I would not come and play again so I just left it there. His posts until my questions had a different touch to them then how he ussualy plays. Why I did not put the FoS/HoS out there earlier you may ask, well I was not in the position to do so and not deemed it necessary, especially since its still more feeling based than actually something I can prove... so a FoS would've been more appropriate... also it would'nt have helped my case if he was scum and female at earlier points in the game... What I think felt different in his behaviour was the fact that he left the lead to hatmoza and the questions he made when he made some, additionaly he was actively (if it was his intention isn't known to me) encouraging my personal distrust into hatmoza, which could have been because it was legit (my character/role against his early deduction of women = evil and me being a sibling, which I am not, or in linkz case his character against wome = evil), but sometimes it felt to me he was trying to steer me into crashing into hatmoza even more than I would without him... then the thing when he was not reading carefully which he kind of admits himself here, I know that I made a mistake in believing in hatmoza's sheep a little too easy, but that is because hatmoza was doing what I expected him to do regarding sheep after his first post about them... About the minor character thing - it reminds me off the discussion I had in the Nightmare before Chrismas round, and once again I have to say I am sorry that I got a minor character assigned... |
I still think you're town for your attempt at reading me. I doubt you'd be able to fake that as scum. So I don't think you're trying to have me mislynched, and thus I'll try to show you that your suspicions are misplaces instead of just laughing you off.
Firstly, your intentions as I recall were that I wasn't acting like my usual(regardless of alignment) self. You now think that I was able to realize I was playing different and you were going to call me out on it, and despite this being a null-tell as to my alignment, I had to act swiftly and act like my normal self for a while to evade your perception. My tone is different because I am not excited about this game; which I have thrice explained now.(and twice to you) I believe we were mafia together one round.(along with A Bad Clown) I hate not being able to truly scumhunt, but I had no issue faking enthusiasm there.(nor any other round in which I've been scum) So once again it's a null-tell.
How can I be letting hatmoza lead yet encourage distrust of him? That doesn't even make sense. Furthermore, if anything, I was encouraging him to distrust you.
When I step up to lead it's because I don't think there's enough activity. Most people are posting just fine here, so I have no issue with letting hatmoza pile up the post count. It's only going to allow me a better read on what could be the biggest asset/hindrance for/to town.
hatmoza never said the women were evil. In fact he first said there's a 66% chance my claim of being a female meant I was town. Of course if he actually is Erica then it was only 50% to him, but still he was only saying Catherine is evil. Clearly 50% odds are better than trying to narrow down evil characters of all the males, so he wanted to focus there.
I've chastised hat in earlier rounds for deliberately outting lovers/siblings to no avail. It's something(a flaw IMO) he does as either alignment, so there really was no point in my saying anything there. You should be able to defend yourself, though if I felt a train was wrongly heading your way then I would try to intervene.
Your link is broken, but it's not that I missed a word or something in your posts. I just had the inflection wrong. "I can't deny you are a sheep" read to me like you accepted it as fact that hatmoza was a sheep, and yes I interpreted the phrases before and after as sugar-coating to continue your showing of emotion: 'Baaah, lynch me to prove hat wrong.. no wait, lynch hat to prove him wrong.' It was just a lot of nonsense to me, which pinged my scumdar. After your mini-go at me I read it differently and realized I was most likely in error.
So, my only question for you is how were you able to decipher your role?
