mrstickball said:
I came to the conclusion prior to Freakanomics, and simply (or not so simply) had it confirmed by watching it, since I had heard so much about the controversy. It makes perfect sense, though. The higher the birth rate, the less resources available per child. The less resources available per child, the less likely they get the nuturing they need to be a productive member of society. So when the birth rate jumped 50% in a 2-3 year span, you had, essentially, a generation of kids that didn't get nutured in the same way. You can separate out such statistics and come to pretty base conclusions about the quality of parenting a family provides, and a correlation of issues. |
The switching to digital representation of currency likely has had a role in the reduction being robbed at gun point, and muggings.







