Reasonable said:
EDIT: actually scratch that a little bit : if - big IF I guess - you assume fully capable Universal Constructors I'd imagine that original ideas/designs would become a source (perhaps the only source) of potential difference between individuals. Would that require some form of barter/monetary system? Assuming no change in basic human behaviour I guess it could. |
Likely so. IP management would still exist in such a society, which would then become a potential source of product to barter.
For example, I may have X, Y and Z needs or wants met, but I create a way to satisfy desire A. If that product is indeed mine, then there would need to be a way to earn return on the time and effort I put into creating said product or service.
I mean, in the past 100 years, productivity for certain goods and services has risen so high that some items can be traded for almost no value. For example, books that were produced a long time ago at a cost of a day's wages now cost nothing via Amazon. Movie delivery through Netflix has taken a product that used to cost a part of a day's wage for a ticket to the theater now is about 1 hour of work for a month worth of content. The amount of money needed to sustain a human's caloric requirement has plummeted as well, as energy-dense foods become cheaper and cheaper.
So I think your on to something smart. Even if certain things were made redundant through a 'Universal Constructor', other goods, services, or research into new goods/products would still be needed, and a form of exchanged would need to exist to ensure such services were bartered correctly.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







