theprof00 said:
Seece said:
theprof00 said:
fillet said:
So he's happy that there's a market for gaming only handhelds.
Wow, this guy aims high.
I'm happy there's a market for prostitutes but i doubt i'll do very well with my pennis, ugly looks, disease, and high price.
Darn, finding it very hard to get across just what a stupid statement this guy is making. I mean establishing a market for something doesn't mean that your product will sell at all. If that were true we'd all be rich! |
Yeah, I'm fine playing mediocre slingshot simulators (angry birds) and throwing balled up paper into baskets.
Make a new post when phones can do what 3ds and vita can.
|
A lot of people are though, even gamers. (Unfortunately)
|
And for sure, one day, games will be a lot better on phones. This guy is completely right when he says that 3ds proved that there is a market for handhelds still. Sure, a lot of people are satisfied with angry birds. But a lot of people bought 3ds's too. Not as many, yet, but soon.
Hey man, and I'm not knocking angry birds. I have a bionic. I like their casual games. But I'm not satisfied with that being the only gaming I do. As long as people like me are around, there will be a market.
|
Don't care if you're knocking angry birds, it's shit, Rocket Riot and Cut the Rope are far superior!
He's right there is an audience for dedicated handhelds, but the effort both Sony and Nintendo need to put in this time around is a heck of a lot more than last gen. I can't see Sony in the same position as Nintendo, they really can't afford to cut, although hopefully they still will, but more importantly they don't have Mario, Pokemon ect ...
Vita has a lot of SW that could be big, but save for the enevitable GTA down the line, I'm surprised Sony arnt cowering behind closed doors.
I do hope they find their mega hits that give you a reason to own a Sony handheld though.
