XanderZane said:
Allow? lol!! Last I checked Sony didn't own Namco, Capcom or SquareEnix. Sony didn't allow anything. The reason those games were released on other platforms was because those companies saw an audience there and felt they could profit from it. These companies wanted a lot more money from Sony to keep them exclusive to the Playstation platform. Sony didn't have that kind of money after having 4 months of quarterly loses. Sony has enough in house exsclusives anyways, so I'm sure they didn't see it as a major problem. Also, you contradicted yourself. You say that Sony doesn't care about XBox gamers. Then you said that Sony cares about gamers who left Playstation and became XBox gamers. lol!! What!?! Let me make it easy for you. Sony don't care about ANY gamers. They care about MONEY and PROFITS. |
No, I didn't contradict myself. The Xbox gamers I referred to (DMC, FF players, etc.) aren't actual Xbox gamers. They are Playstation gamers because they are playing Playstation games, but on an Xbox. A gamer should be identified by his or her games, not his or her console.
And yes, Namco, Capcom, & Square Enix have to do what Sony says. If not, they will be left out when Playstation 4 domination begins. Sony gave them permission to release their games on the Xbox because Sony wanted to satisfy the Playstation gamers that game on Xbox.
And if you're wondering, Sony intentionally failed the Playstation 3. They could have sold over 200 million units and put Nintendo & Microsoft out of business. Just look at what they did to Sega. However, they decided to be in third place so they wouldn't be accused of leading a monopoly. Because of their failure this gen, Sony can and will dominate next generation without getting in trouble for starting a monopoly.
It's like how Michael Jordan dominated for so long, he decided to retire. Then he came back years later to dominate again. That is what Sony is doing. Don't try to argue with me because all my points are well founded.







