Does Sony Care More About Their Gamer's Then Microsoft and Nintendo...

[ThePS3News]

TruckOSaurus said:

ThePS3News said:

Soonerman said:
Lol no. They thought they could shove expensive crap down people's throats. Just look at the Vita and ridiculous prices on the accessories!

Yes Sony has recently had to charge more then their competitiors on thier products. But the real question is was IT worth the investment.

The Vita may be expensive but it does/offers alot then its competitor. Just need to wait on the "Must have" games.

I haven't read the whole thread (and I won't) but I'm jumping in right here. If we take the PS3 as an example, 599$ was not worth it. I waited a year and a half ( to buy a PS3 until the release of MGS4) and I missed nothing of worth and paid less. From my point of view, early adopters got royally screwed.

Well it really depends on how you viewed the PS3 at the time in 2006.

$599 for a system that at the time offered Blu-ray, Free online, Free Internet browser, Blue tooth capiablities, More Realiable then the "Other Guy", and had a decent amount of exclusives games at the time seemed like a deal to me. (Not to mention it was ofcourse more powerful then the other consoles)

Also MGS4 in my opinion was not the first "Must Have" game only on the PS3. I would proably say Uncharted: Drake fortune was, But thats just me...

OT: If you are not gonna read the whole OP of the thread, then you have already defeated the purpose of understanding and answering the question of the title...