To awnser sentence by sentence;
1. Wrong. They tried to have the most powerful hardware only this last generation. Since Ps1 < N64 and Ps2 < GC < Xbox in terms of power.
2. That's the only true point, but yet it's not beacause they care more. It's just beacuse they must have free online, if they want to compete with the enstablished Xbox Live.
3. This one depends on opinions. EAD, Intelligent Systems and Retro would make me say the other guy, has the best 1st pary studios. But anyone rightfully has its own opinions.
4.Wrong again. The real reson why Ps3 made them lose money is beacuse Sony tought: Ps2 helped DVD to enstablish so the Ps3 will be an help to sell more HDTVs and Blu-ray movies, even if it costs 599$. They were wrong, most people back in 2006 had no reason to upgrade to HDTVs, when most TV channels were still analog, or not HD anyway. Also most people in 2006, and still now, don't need to play blu-ray movies when they can have DVDs. Don't get me wrong, I love blu-rays but not as a gamer. It's a fact that blu-ray are totally worthless unless you have the proper expansive video, and also audio, equipment to play them.In other words what Soonerman said before: "They thought they could shove expensive crap down people's throats".
