bouzane said:
thranx said:
bouzane said:
thranx said:
bouzane said:
@thranx
I'm condescending toward you because you are extremely ignorant, inexcusably so. Why bother to participate in such a discussion at all? I have no patience for such individuals as yourself.
|
perhaps you should use valid counter arguments instead of trying to attack my character and intelligence. You haven't even made a counter argument.
|
Posting valid counter arguments like I did on the previous page as opposed to the drivel you posted when you did nothing more than link to the dictionary definion of the word theory and reiterate the exact same drivel you have been this entire time?
|
seeing as your only argument was i used theory incorrect i thought perhaps you wanted a definition. So there it is. The rest of your post contained nothing. there are plenty of missing links. Pease show me the path that human evolution took every step of the way. I have not seen that yet. Did you even read all of my posts? I have already agreed to evolution happening and being a valid theory, it just does not fully explain how humans came to be. Either they have not found all of the evidence yet, or its not there, either way there is plenty of room for doubt in the "theory" of human evolution. (although i do personaly believe in human evolution, i can clearly see the other side has valid arguments especially when so many people spout human evoltion as absolute fact when it is not)
|
Sorry but the Webster definition is vague and woefully inadequate for defining scientific theory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
essential reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_as_fact_and_theory
As far as the other side having valid arguments, they do not. There is evidence to support evolution, there is none to support Creationism. Remember that Creationism is not actually a theory, it is a poorly formulated hypothesis with absolutely nothing to back it up.
|
were did i say creationism was the other side? I was only arguing that evoltuion does not fully explain how humans came to be, you have yet to address that point. Websters is one of the oldest dictionaries, since we are talking on a forum I am using standard general english in what i said websters is the best definition.
