By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
osamanobama on 08 January 2012
Edit Thread
thismeintiel said:
osamanobama said:
thismeintiel said:
Troll_Whisperer said:
I hope Sony don't make the same mistakes this time around, having the best graphics is cool and all, but that's not what will bring success.

I wouldn't worry about that.  Sony can have the best graphics, while also having a ver competitive price.  They are sticking with Blu-ray (I imagine we'll see a 8x or 12x drive this time around) and probably won't be developing a brand new CPU tech (probably will stick to something similar to the Cell).  So we're going to be getting much more RAM and a much better GPU.  My guess is we're going to be getting better graphics than even those mock-up trailers Sony did for the PS3.

 

Killzone 2 looks significantly better than that trailer, and Killzone 3 takes a shit all over it.

ps3 produces way better graphics than that

You have got to be joking.  I'm a big Sony/PS3 supporter and own both Killzone 2 and 3, both of which I feel are the two best looking FPSs on console.  While GG tried their best to get close to those trailers, they are definitely nowhere near being better than that trailer.  Facial animation, the scale of the city and battle, poly count and texture detail are all better in that trailer than in the real game.  There is a reason why there was controversy when both Motorstorm and Killzone 2 were actually released, but it had nothing to do with the graphics being better than what was shown at E3 '05.

are you watching the same video i am?

that if that game were to release today, it would be average at best graphically. Many many games have passed that up. the faces look way more cartoon-y, the explosions look fake, the gun models are crap-ola, the environmental detail is... lacking. every thing just looks not very good. its not impresive by todays standards.

motorstorm on the other hand...