By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
amaral_slb said:
ironmanDX said:
amaral_slb said:
.

You are like, has Potter grown as a magician to the point where he can defeat Voldemort and the end you go like, really? The path to the end is clearly better then the end itself, IMO.

Still great


Potter was no where near as powerful as Voldemort... Not by a long shot.


yeah I am sorry, this is what I ment.

You are like, has Potter grown as a magician to the point where he can defeat Voldemort??? Doesn´t look like it, but someone has to go...... with magic

Potter is groing as an individual and a wizard during the books, and at the end it is like he doesn´t "Win"(or lose) because of how good (or bad) he was as a wizard compared to the weaken Vold

To be fair, Voldemort was an exceptionnal wizard, Harry was not. She made the character of Harry as a more than average wizzard but not more.

It would not have been logic for Harry to kill Voldemort while getting humiliated 1 year before by Snape who is himself ridiculous compared to Voldemort.

I would not have been against giving Harry more power, but the author choose differently.

Mrs Weasley killing Bellatrix was meh I thought, other than that the final book was epic.

Much better than the movie, (Voldemort looks like a pathetic alien in the movies).