pezus said:
Play4Fun said:
pezus said:
Play4Fun said:
pezus said:
swii26 said:
Nintendo leads the way with innovation... the other 2 follow and copy what Nintendo does. With motion controls Sony copied by making Move and Xbox didnt want to follow suit so they came up with Kinect, similar by still using motion. Both Sony and Microsoft have more money to play with so they can come out with technologically superior systems but they dont really change the gaming experience. Wii kicked both their asses and it wasnt technically the better system as far as specs.
Nintendo is ONLY focused on making great software and innovative hardware for us gamers to experience. |
So being technically advanced is not innovation? Which nintendo is now copying with Wii U. And oh, touch screens, did Nintendo innovate there?
|
Doing what is expected of you is innovative? Oh pezus...
Altthough I guess Sony did innovate with Cell. Wasn't really worth it though, IMO.
|
New technology is innovation, even though we expect new technology all the time. Blu-ray, Cell, Xbox Live etc. are all innovations just as much as Wii's controllers are.
|
Having more hardware more powerful than your previous hardware isn't innovation.
Xbox Live is the only one of the three that you listed I would classify as innovation for gaming on the level of Wii's controller.
|
The only reason you say that is because Nintendo didn't go that route.
|
Except they did go that route, for a very, very long time
The whole Wii type phenomenon didn't start until recently
I've never heard anyone actually argue this, that's why you've left me completely baffled 
