Vertigo-X said:
With your example, you said Ascii would be lent $100 by you and he would have to pay $10 per month for 24 months or $240 for the two years.
After that, you lost me. Where do I come into this and why are you paying me $1 a month? Why would I end up paying you 50% of what Ascii lost/didn't pay you?
I appreciate the response, Kasz! This is a good discussion, I think! |
I'll fill in for Kasz.
You are essentially an insurer, Kasz is paying you a dollar a month for insurance. If his loan fails, you have to pay up half of what's owed. This benefits Kasz, because even if the loan does fail, he will still get atleast half of his money back. If the loan doesn't fail, you will benefit, as you would have profited from the dollar a month.
The more likely the loan is to fail, the more Kasz would have to pay you, as you have a greater risk, and the potential dollar a month wouldn't be worth the risk to you (also, the riskier the loan, the more Kasz will worry, so he is willing to pay more for insurance, which is actually far more important in the final price of insurance - how much you think Kasz is willing to pay).







