By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SOLIDSNAKE08 on 31 December 2011
Edit Thread
VetteDude said:
SOLIDSNAKE08 said:
Ham_Burgular said:
JazzyJeez said:
Ham_Burgular said:
Its true though, Xbox is the much bigger success either way. PS3 had a price cut, it has Japan and it had a ton of exclusives, something Xbox didnt have and its still a tie. Roles reversed Xbox would have stomped the PS3.

Still dont forget Vgchartz arent very accurate, wait for the official numbers to see if theres anything over or under tracked.


Some people would argue that it's multi-plats that are far more important to a console, maybe its the alcohol but I struggle how people can use exclusives and Japan as the only reason the PS3 has sold as well as it has, it would be like people claiming the only reason the 360 is doing well is because of the dominance of the single biggest market in the world and also having kinect,one of the fastest selling electronic devices ever and then claiming if it was reversed PS3 would stomp the 360, ifs and buts.

If the PS3 didnt have the many exlusives and Japan it would still have sold well, just not nearly aswell as Xbox.

what if xbox never had america? even if it had a 10 year headstart it would be behind now without america. or what if the ps3 laucnhed same time as 360 at same price, where would 360 be now. see theres no point of IFS cause they can go on forever and they're stupid.

Are you even kidding me? Yep lets just say the the biggest gaming market in the world doesn't exist and then PS3 WOULD BE WINNERZ! Who even gives a crap what console wins, both are over 50 million and are HIGHLY successful consoles if you look at past console sales.


yes its stupid! i was trying to make that point to ham burgular