| Lord Ciansworth said: People are getting seriously bogged down in moralistic arguments based on expectations they had about Sony's online service, while conveniently ignoring reality. I doubt very much what Sony did equates to creating a good PR image but they were entirely legally and morally justified to do it. The simple truth remains that when each customer initially agreed to the PSN EULA they agreed that Sony could change the terms of that usage at any time, for virtually any reason. If I buy a product and knowingly sign an agreement that allows the product's manufacturer to change the terms of its usage I have absolutely no basis, legal, moral, or otherwise to oppose those changes when they happen. For God sake, I knowingly signed an agreement that said they could make those changes. |
Except EULA's aren't really fully legally enforceable.
The EULA part about not sueing was never really meant to hold up so much as try and convince people to not sue them.
The majority of things in EULA's aren't enforceable and are just there for show to try and convince people to not do those things.
