People are getting seriously bogged down in moralistic arguments based on expectations they had about Sony's online service, while conveniently ignoring reality. I doubt very much what Sony did equates to creating a good PR image but they were entirely legally and morally justified to do it. The simple truth remains that when each customer initially agreed to the PSN EULA they agreed that Sony could change the terms of that usage at any time, for virtually any reason. If I buy a product and knowingly sign an agreement that allows the product's manufacturer to change the terms of its usage I have absolutely no basis, legal, moral, or otherwise to oppose those changes when they happen. For God sake, I knowingly signed an agreement that said they could make those changes.
All these "scandals" are just a bit of internet bluster caused by about three nerds. Everybody else clicks "I agree" and gets on with enjoying their games. The level of actual caring about these issues by PS3 owners is perfectly synopsized in this photograph: http://i56.tinypic.com/2w5rmuo.jpg. Mountain out of molehill methinks.
I also assume the "Is A PS3 Worth Having Anymore ????" is a bit of sarcastic faux-trolling.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
