Lawsuit filed against Sony's anti-lawsuit provision

[Izo]

thekitchensink said:

Izo said:
Everyone targets Sony with there none sense. Another lawsuit to fail for laughing enjoyment. People should focus on companies that ACTUALLY step on your rights instead of wasting there time because they personally hate Sony or w/e there reason is. Wasting your resources on stupid crap like this.

Why do you guys think Sony gets targeted so much with lawsuits? I personally think its jealousy/childish I didn't get what I wanted so lets attack

Do you think these people are starting lawsuits for legit reasons or hatred/opportunity?

Um.... Sony is trying to veto people's right to sue them, no matter how the company could potentially fuck up in the future.  That sets an incredibly dangerous precedent.  People are trying to do something about this 'stupid crap' that infringes on the very foundations of their rights as consumers.

But no, you're right, they obviously just hate Sony.

How do you feel about arbitration then? Or should they be  mass lawsuits where the consumer gets petty nothing and the lawyers make out with everything?

There agreement states to my knowledge that you can go into arbitration which if you win you get personal damages but thats not good enough. If it cant be a mass lawsuit lets get rid of it. It would be insanely easy to proove if Sony is at fault for lossng your credit card or w/e issue it may be and you would win a personal case.

It's not the consumer that filled that lawsuit because Sony lost credit card numbers it was greedy ass lawyers that wanted to take advantage of a situation and as a defense to this they say you into abritration instead if you want to use PSN (a free service).

So from what I take from this is. If you want to mass sue us and cost millions for little personal gain you can't use our service but instead if you want to personally gain what you lost and you can proove it to a judge you can do that instead.