Mr Puggsly said:
I think you're just looking at Live for its online gaming and not Live as whole. Which is why I said Live "AS IS" can't be supported on ads alone. The free "similar services" you mentioned don't take on the same over head cost or offer as much but you ignore that. But okay, lets say I'm guessing. You're the one guessing they can provide the same service relying just on ads. Even though there is nothing comparable that does. |
I'm not guessing anything. I haven't said they can or can't. I'd just like to know whether they could or not but we obviously don't know.
EDIT: BTW not having a go at you - I know you're making an intelligent guess. I just would like to see if there was any concrete data on how much revenue advertising in Live brings in for MS.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...







