Oh, and try not to sound like a talking point for two seconds when you say someone is against the civil rights amendment. The very concept that you need the government to tell you how to treat others on your property is an absurd concept. As others have clearly explained a private business has the right to conducts its business as it sees fit and if that business model includes not allowing a particular race to patron it's establishment then so be it. I would chose not purchase products from that business as would many others and the business model would fail. Do you think Wal*mart would be successful if it decided to no longer allow white people in the doors? Would target be in business if it said black people can't spend their money here? And let's say for argument sake that a company was able to create a business model based on client restriction and accepted no government funds or tax breaks in the creation and operation of that business. Who am I to interfere with their right to prosper?







