By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
Rath said:
Kasz216 said:

I don't see why Iran would be a big reason.

Obama seems like he's just as willing to go to war vs Iran as any republican candidate is.

Also, attacking Iran isn't quite as unpopular as you'd think.

"However, asked if the U.S. should take military action if sanctions against Iran to prevent its nuclear weapons program proved to be unsuccessful, 50 percent voted in favor of using military force."

All the Republican candidates (apart from Paul) are saying that America should have attacked Iran over the drone which they lost while spying on them.

Doesn't matter if it's popular, invading Iran would be rather stupid, especially when there is a decent chance the pro-democracy movement in Iran could take over when the next election is rigged.

I never said it'd be smart to invade Iran.  Or even go to war with Iran, which isn't the same thing as invading it.


I was just saying that Obama (who hasn't gone to war with Iran over the drone) is less of a warmonger than most of the Republican field who say that he should have.