fordy said:
o_O.Q said:
"PLEASE show me in the articles where Theresa Verity (whom I quoted) said that the fix was secure. She says no such thing"
she doesn't and i didn't say she did either... the general consensus is that eventually the ps3 may be hacked again, however, i don't see how anything else was expected
"There is a ton of motive behind why propaganda needs to be spread that the system is secure again."
true, but using that logic i could just as easily dismiss the leaking of the keys as propaganda against sony just like the nonsense i've seen about other os being advertised as a major feature...
you seem to believe that propaganda only works in one direction... it doesn't... if we are to accept news of the keys leaking via reports over the internet why can't we accept news of a possible fix being implemented?
"What's to say that these so-called "experts" who side with Sony aren't being paid to say this?"
so are you trying to tell me that sony has payed off all of the hackers that they were at war with them to act as if the ps3 had been fixed?... lol come on now... if thats not the case why have no hackers come forward to dispute the reports?
|
So are you a key publish denier? So what you're saying is, all this reaction made by Sony was all made up, and they just wasted their money fixing something that wasn't broken? Is that what you're trying to tell me? Please, propaganda may work both ways, but there is such a thing as common sense here. Would Sony waste their time fixing something that didn't exist? No. Would they have a motive to get experts to comment on the safety of their system after a recent breach? Absolutely!
Why haven't hackers come forward? What are you talking about? There is one hacker stepping forward in the article that you showed me: Theresa Verity, and that's without me even looking for any! Are you blind to evidence that doesn't support your case?
|
"So what you're saying is"
i'm not all i'm saying is that its absurd to say that one set of information from a source is valid but then deny other information because it doesn't line up with how you think things should be...
"There is one hacker stepping forward in the article that you showed me:Theresa Verity"
what did she say specifically that contradicts my point?