fordy said:
You do realise that I've stated (at least 5 times now) that Sony have EVERY right to control their PSN service as they see fit? So stop talking about online topics, alright? That point has already been argued as moot and redundant. If Sony want to control online hacking, they can do it on their side. And where does it stop? If restricting the entire group further reduces piracy, where does the restrictions stop? Would you be okay if Sony annoucned tomorrow that they were axing BluRay playback because it was deemed a security risk? Who sets the bar of security vs piracy? Sony? What right do they have to dictate the rules on a piece of hardware I bought? What if other companies decided to do this? What if you bought a car tomorrow, only to be followed up later saying "Ah ah....you'd better use it the way we tell you, or you're going to jail". I mean, it will stop reckless driving, right? It would reduce accidents, right? Tell me....WHERE.....DOES....IT.....STOP!? |
Lets talk strictly game theft then. Lets say Sony makes a perfect PSN that completely stops online cheating. They still lose millions in software theft that they could've used to bring us more content so it still effects the majority.
This is where is stops. Being reasonable. Sony can defend themselves in the relm of reason. When they do something that stomps your rights come back and bring this point up. They protected themselves they have that RIGHT. Who has the right to set the bar? This was a clear cut and dry problem the OtherOS was going to cause problems. Its not about who sets the bar anyone could have seen this threat. Your allowed to protect yourself within the relm of reason
The car thing is funny. Modding console directly led to the breaking in and then pirating of software. Sony doesnt tell you how to use anything. So thats moot. Again it stops in the relm of reason.
It comes down to this. It doesn't matter who gets burned in the process as long as 1 underused feature stays.







