fordy said:
You just made a GIANT contradiction there, and I'll explain why: So tell me, how is the will of the few (the pirates) being looked at as the general discourse as opposed to the majority (legitimate users), who would, say, wish to run a Linux home theater setup? Well, given your point in number 2, that's the contradiction. The majority of the users who would use this break for legitimate purposes are being "damaged" by the minority who wish to pirate games, in that they can no longer use their feature. The way I see it, if you pirate, you should feel the full force of the law. Should YOU care if other people pirate? Only if you're a developer or publisher. In other words, whatever they do with their console is THEIR business, much like whatever I do with MY console is MY business. If they wish to pirate with it, they can, but they still have to deal with copyright laws just like the other systems do. There is no need to overcomplicate things here.. |
The will of a few? The pirates do not come in few they steal games in the millions and cause hacked online lobbies. Also the OtherOS users were also very few and it sucks for them but theres a bigger picture here and they could have kept OtherOS if they wanted.
The way I see it is that people become reasonable and stop pirating where it starts. Punishing each and every pirate is impossible and its millions in damaging fighting a pointless war. Modding a console is fun but it leads to problems just so a FEW people can use them legit and the rest steal everything they can. Mod on your PC dont create problems for others.
Yes it is the pirates who damaged the few who used OtherOS. People who want to play a stupid snes emulator on there ps3 defend modding even if that is what opens the door to theft. Then there solution to the problem is to target each person seperately no matter how much money and resources it takes.







