Christhor on 13 December 2011
| PullusPardus said: Or sony could have made a console that isn't a pain in the ass to work on , and isn't too much relying on CPU (like a handheld device) but rather more on RAM and GPU (like a PC) why does it rely too much on CPU but most of the CPU load goes on the XMB ? and whats worse is that most of the XMB load isn't really useful stuff , like dynamic moving icons, and dynamic video chat plus bluray streaming, who gives a crap about all that?, instead they should remove dynamic icons and have Cross game chat for example, and redesign the XMB to stop it from raping the CPU , and RAM , thus making more memory for developers, the PS3 is designed the same as an Phone, it's main point is fast "Snap-in-Snap-out" multitasking, but PS3 doesn't need that, because you can't even use most of the XMB while ingame anyways, so its a mess. |
I agree with this. It's pretty obvious that if Sony made a console easier to work with, the games would have been just as good on the PS3 as the other platforms. However, I don't believe the problems get big enough to boycott the PS3 versions.
