Kudistos Megistos said:
It is. And therefore, a rebuttal of the video isn't really an argument for anything. The blogger clarly seems to be picking on one video in order to make a broad political point, which is quite intellectually dishonest. And even so, the blogger twists and cherry picks. Assuming that birth rates amongst immigrants will be the same as birth rates in their country of origin? That's a big assumption to make, espeically when immigrants tend to be younger than average and to come from (and join) lower socio-economic classes, whose birth rates tend to be higher. And it's pretty dishonest to only look at birth rates for countries like Tunesia and Turkey (i.e. the ones with the lowest birth rates in the Islamic world) and ignore Islamic immigration to Europe from countries like Afghanistan and Somalia, which have much higher birthrates. Classic cherry picking. And finally, he ignores the question of how many of the births in the European countries he compares are to Muslim families. Europe isn't going to be Muslim-majority by 20-whatever the video says. But nor will the Muslim poulation remain low, which is what the blogger implies. |
Data was provided that showed they were basing it on the countries that most of the immgirants were coming from, which tended to be Tunisia, Turkey, and Algeria, at least as far as France went

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







