By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ArnoldRimmer said:
MontanaHatchet said:
ArnoldRimmer said:
Mr Khan said:

As Kasz has pointed out, money tends to follow popularity, and not the other way around.

Any clear proof for that? Because I really don't believe this is true when huge corporations with big wallets can donate as well.

I might believe that the number of donators somehow follows popularity, but not the sum of donations.

Comparing the campaign funding of Mitt Romney and Ron Paul for example shows huge differences:

 

Ron Paul

48 percent from small individual contributions

Ron Paul for Congress Cmte, U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, Mason Capital Management, Microsoft, Boeing, Google, Overland Sheep, IBM*

 

Mitt Romney

10 percent from small individual contributions

Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse Group, Morgan Stanley, HIG Capital, Barclays, Kirkland & Ellis, Bank of America, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, EMC Corp, JPMorgan Chase*


So are you blaming Jews or corporations/banks? Or both? Is your argument wholly anti-semitic or just partially?

WTF?

I was just about to report your posting, but then I saw that you are a moderator, so I guess there's no point in doing so.

I really don't understand how people like you could become moderators though.

What were you going to report me for anyways if I wasn't a moderator? What I said was accurate and I never insulted you. I quote:

"I'm afraid Ron Paul is not going to get that much money, like Obama. The jewish lobby doesn't like them, because they are both not unconditionally loyal to Israel in cases when Israel's and America's interests collide. Ron Paul wasn't even invited to that AIPAC republican presidential candidates event. For that reason, both Ron Paul and Obama will probably collect small campaign funding budgets and also get few votes from both jews and evangelicalist christs."

Interesting that the first thing you mention regarding a lack of fundraising ability is Jews and Israel. Don't push your luck.