crissindahouse said:
it's not like "they cost 1 billion so microsoft will be 1 billion poorer after that" it's their company then, same like i build a house. it costs 500k but i'm not 500k poorer then because it's mine :) so, if this company wouldn't cost much more than it is are worth it would be good for microsoft but if they are worth 1 billion and they would have to pay 5 billion yeah this could be not so clever^^ like with skype not sure if this was a good deal but seeing what they pay for skype they could do something like that in the videogame devision as well. rare was the last huge buy that was 2001 or so? lol that's funny on their site: "© 2004-2011, Epic Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Epic, Epic Games, the Epic Games logo, Gears of War, Gears of War 2, Marcus Fenix, the Crimson Omen logo, Unreal, Unreal Engine, Unreal Tournament, and the Unreal Tournament 3 logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Epic Games, Inc. in the United States of America and elsewhere. Other brands or product names are the trademarks of their respective owners. |
Hah yeah, funny how they specifically trademarked Marcus Fenix :P
You have a good point, it could work out, as for Skype, in the end it could be profitable for them if they put Skype in the right direction, I should imagine they planned that for the long term when buying them...







