| o_O.Q said: so why is america the only country that should be allowed to have nukes? a better suggestion would be to destroy all nuclear weapons before they can cause harm... but of course thats a childish fantasy |
No country should have nukes, but a world where no country has nukes is a fantasy. Fact is if every major country fully disarmed others would equip themselves. Fighting a nuclear country with a conventional army is futile.
Right now their are several countries with nukes. So far these countries are relatively safe and won't collapse and don't pose a massive imminent threat. Even communist China isn't dumb enough to use a nuke, but if we allow more countries to acquire them its only a matter of time before a dip shit gets his hands on one.
The main powers Russia, China, US, Britain will do everything in their power to prevent a nuclear apocolypse but if you get enough nukes out in the wrong hands even their determination to control the situation will fall apart. If Washington DC or Moscow or Beijing or London were nuked the people of those countries would demand nuclear retribution and no matter what the Governments do to try and calm and defuse the situation hell will break loose.
Now that countries have nukes the biggest priority for international security is to contain the situation and prevent nuclear devices from being used by any and all means necessary!
-JC7
"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer
