By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
Xenostar said:

Theres alot of "Agressive Pricecut" references, its was $50, that's like a minimum price cut, $100 would of been agressive.

 

 

I also wish i lived in his world where its a toss up between a second holiday or a console. 


I dont think a price cut of 17% is a minium price cut.... and it is a hell of a lot more aggressive than no price cut at all.

Given the state of Sony finances I would suggest its a hell of a price cut.



I'm pretty sure nearly everyone believed the $50 price cut would pose a rather passive effect on sales (compared to other cuts) the moment it was announced. Also, percentages usually mean little to consumers compared to the actual quantity of the drop.