kowenicki said:
Xenostar said:
Theres alot of "Agressive Pricecut" references, its was $50, that's like a minimum price cut, $100 would of been agressive.
I also wish i lived in his world where its a toss up between a second holiday or a console.
|
I dont think a price cut of 17% is a minium price cut.... and it is a hell of a lot more aggressive than no price cut at all.
Given the state of Sony finances I would suggest its a hell of a price cut. |
I'm pretty sure nearly everyone believed the $50 price cut would pose a rather passive effect on sales (compared to other cuts) the moment it was announced. Also, percentages usually mean little to consumers compared to the actual quantity of the drop.