By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Boutros on 28 November 2011
Edit Thread
Scoobes said:
Boutros said:
Kasz216 said:
Boutros said:
Kasz216 said:
I'm just happy thanks to consoles I can play it on "High".

Can't comment on the highest end settings, but I can say that thanks to consoles crappy graphical ability there probably was much more focus on performance for those of us with PC's that are 3-4 years old.

Which is why the "You have to upgrade your PC every year" argument makes me laugh.

''Consoles crappy graphical ability''?

That's just trolling..

How so?  Due to console's low standards and general poor level ability (IE, lesser then actually my crappy off the shelf 3 year old PC) games are made at a much lower standard graphically.

Which is good, because it means i can run them.

Back when Morrowing came out.  There was no way you were running it on a three year old computer and getting framerates that good.

 

Console graphics are objectivly crappy in power compaired to PCs.

There are like 3 PC games that have much better graphics than games on consoles. The rest all look about the same.

Calling it crappy is trolling and you'd think you know that by now.

Err... no they don't. A good number of multi-plats now ofer a significant improvement over the console versions. Even when devs don't try (e.g. Mass Effect 2 uses the same textures) there is a noticeable difference due to higher anti-aliasing, better lighting effects, more shadows, longer view distances etc.

Yes but the console version doesn't look crappy in comparison..