Rainbird said:
By the sound of it, I think the lip reading is merely an example to illustrate the precision it will have. It doesn't actually say they will be doing it. |
Yeah but lip reading is technically something else. if they just mean it can resolve lips the shouldn't use the term. I'm nitpicking on language and context use. Lip reading means decoding and understanding words from position of lips, not being able to see them. Assuming they can see them it should be possible I'm just doubtful about many words, languagues, etc. they could easily support at launch.
TBH it would be better example if they're talking about resolution to focus on fingers given the origianl "can it, can't it" debate around Kinect resolving individual fingers.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...







