Seece said:
Seriously, wtf? You completely misread his post. He is saying Sony had a bad Q this Q, and the next will be bad (assuming) and the next without there being a tsunami, meaning you can't soely blame the tsunami. He isn't saying anything of the sort that somehow suggests he wants or likes a tsunami or anything you can attack him for there .... |
He could've said it in a much better way. It was crass and insulting.
Look, Sony lost 3 billions in factories and product.
How long do you think it takes to rebuild those factories? You think just because something happened it means there are no prolonged effects? That's like thinking a nuke doesn't cause devastation over time. It's not just that they lost money. They lost money and the means to make more money. They need to rebuild completely that entire wing of their operations.
It's not just a rude remark, it's unfounded.









