Snesboy said:
nightsurge said:
Snesboy said:
Play4Fun said:
Snesboy said:
D-Joe said:
http://s3gal3aks.wordpress.com/
CPU : IBM Power 710
- Architecture : IBM POWER7
- Cores : 6 Core
- Clockspeed : 3.72 GHz
GPU : Custom AMD Radeon HD Graphics
- Configuration : Single Die Dual Core
- Clockspeed : 750MHz
- Daughter Die : Renesas Electronics 100MB eDRAM
RAM : 2GB 512-Bit GDDR5 256GB/s (Unified Memory Architecture)
|
It's sad the only thing the new Xbox outclasses is my CPU speed.
|
Good thing those specs would do much more in a console than it ever could in your PC, eh?
>=(
|
Not really. Especially since the new systems will only support one monitor anyway.
|
Your crystal ball must still be working. Mine broke the other day so I can't see the future anymore.
All joking aside, you're wrong. The current consoles can even support more than one monitor, so why wouldn't their predecessors?
And what's really sad is that you feel the need to compare a full fledged $1000+ game rig to a console that will be under $500 and perform very similarly if not better at certain things.
Oh and by the way, these are rumors, not facts, so again, silly to compare right now.

|
My rig was 700. :P
Link me to where an Xbox 360 and a PS3 can support two monitors? PS3 was supposed to before it released but they got rid of it.
Anyway, consoles suck.
|
well, you'd need 3 360s or 3 PS3s, which would cost more than a PC that can handle it XD. You can technically play Froza3(prolly 4 too) or GT5 that way