Michael-5 said:
functional isn't necessarily good, GT wasn't as favorable. GT on Killzone "In the end however the entire campaign does support the move, though the results are mixed. Aiming and movement work well, and waggling to melee makes sense, but the snap aim and twist motion for reloading take a while to nail" I said aiming was difficult, and GT does say snap aim is difficult to nail. I said the analog controller is better then the move, the only difference from me and IGN was that I said much better. What I said in the end is no different from the GT and IGN reviews. Do I need to defend my claims to this degree on everything I say thats the slightest bit negative towards a PS3 exclusive? If I did this for Halo, no one would care...geez. As for Uncharted 3... It's shorter then Uncharted 2. Where is this comming from? I wasn't wrong about it being 8 hours long. GT said "split up into 20 plus chapters you'll reach the zenith in 8 hours." For UC2 they said the game was 10 hours. For your comment on Uncharted 3. GT said "Co-op Arena is uncharteds takes on Hoarde play......It's lack of support object makes it feel a bit dated", "No matter which mode you choose, or weather your playing with or against friends, their have been many changes to the overall framework.............(lists stuff).............but many of these features it's a better case of better late then never", "Once you head online you'll find that a full clip of an asssult rifle isn't enough to get the job done, you'll steal other peoples kills as much as they steal yours and it results in the whole thing fealing randomly chaotic and times. The newly only exasterbates the issue by making it more difficult to talk foes............the overall vibe to the multiplayer can be an aquired taste, but once you learn its intracasies it's easy to love it for what it is and get hooked" This is enough to validate my opinion on multiplayer. Nowhere do they say it's better then average, and it's full of flaws. In that thread Osama was pushing that the game is flaw less, and that one one of my complaints with IGN's score. MP is full of flaws, and nothing special. Unique, but not special, and GT only ever said it was unique, never particularly good. They only said "The campaign is short, but the multiplayer makes it worth the asking price." I interpret that as it's not bad. Now this is unrelated to the thread. MUGEN pointed out that I don;t agree with him on KZ3, and he wants people to think that game is flawless too, but it isn't and neither is UC3. I shouldn't be heckled at for claiming such things, people do it all the time for 360 and Wii exclusives, why is PS3 getting so much damn forum support? Are these games not fun enough to keep more PS3 fans on forums, or like someone once said to me "I just gave up on VGC forums because people don't know what they are talking about, and will fight for one console without playing the games on others." I at least have played them, and I say bad things about games on all consoles. Nice to know someone is keeping track of my comments. I'll be sure to quote reiews word for word from now on when I talk about PS3 games. geez. I'm a fan of Uncharted too, but some of the fans on this site really As for Forza 4. It's a lot better then GT5, and I thought people would agree, but a lot of people (who haven't played Forza 4) were absolutly certain that GT5 was better, so I didn't try to force my opinion, I know it would have gotten no where. Either way, that thread, just an example of how I don't force my opinion, I saw other people had a different opinion, and I never once called them ignorant, or insulted them. Just was telling MUGEN to bug off with the insults. Not needed in this forum. MUGEN - You really need to learn how to talk to people better. On forums it's no big deal, but people in the real world won't tolerate you if your so sour all the time. People will disagree with you, you don't need to insult them just because they do. If you want to avoid me, don't end comments insulting me, that's not a nice way at all to talk to others. If you insult others for no reason, I will be there to tell you to bug off, deal with it. I don't like agressors. |
"I said aiming was difficult, and GT does say snap aim is difficult to nail."
well actually they said "take a while to nail" and as far as i know that's reffering to a learning curve the funny thing is that you actually contradict yourself here with a proper quote from the review
"Aiming and movement work well"
"MP is full of flaws, and nothing special"
lol the guy mentioned 2 flaws - the shots require to kill and the chaotic feel at times, how does that boil down to full of flaws?
secondly i can't name any mp game ever released that doesn't have at least a few identifiable flaws... in fact heres a question - whats your favourite mp game of this year?
"GT said "split up into 20 plus chapters you'll reach the zenith in 8 hours." For UC2 they said the game was 10 hours."
well that thread was about ign's review so i guess you were confusing the 2
" he wants people to think that game is flawless too, but it isn't and neither is UC3."
no i don't think that was ever his motive he just disagreed with what you said about the multiplayer being unbalanced... does having balanced mp automatically make a game flawless? because thats the only way that i could agree that thats what he was doing
"In that thread Osama was pushing that the game is flaw less"
please quote him where he said or implied that
"Do I need to defend my claims to this degree on everything I say thats the slightest bit negative towards a PS3 exclusive?"
weren't you doing the same in the forza thread?
"I shouldn't be heckled at for claiming such things"
agreed but you should be if you make absolutely wrong claims about what reviewers have said
