The lowest current review on metacritic is a funny read.
The person clearly didn't play through the whole game and he downright lies about features in the game. For example he says there is no split-screen co-op when there is. He then goes on to imply that enemies have infinite respawns when that has never been the case in any Halo game. He clearly also didn't play any of the multiplayer since he doesn't even mention the updated gameplay and the return of the 3 shot pistol.
He laments that the original game has not been preserved (which it has in every sense) then goes on to complain that no new additions have been made to the game. He didn't even manage to find more than one terminal, seriously did he play the game for like 3 hours?
I'm ok with criticism in reviews, after all some people prefer the non-stop action that todays current fps like COD provide in their campaign. What pisses me off is a reviewer that lies about features in the game, doesn't play the game more than a few hours and presents a totally nonsensical and contradictory ending argument giving a low score.
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers
