D-Joe said:
it may sounds fanboyism i think you can edit the thread and put every(about 5 i think)screenshots/videos comparsion to there |
I cant verify it for a for a few more days, but the comparison video most people are looking at supposedly used the low resolution textures of the 360..
Also.. this guy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhHLuDL3DEA says even by running the game from Hard drive alone on the 360 it will show lower quality textures..
Other then that the only question in my mind is ( regardles of whether the quality is better or not ) how did they get that much content on one DVD for 360 owners when Blue Dragon which had less content and lower quality graphics came on 3 DVD's.. Is it possible they compressed data on the 360 version ?
Looking at format limitations of DVD ..There is no reason the game shouldn't look alittle better on bluray because its possible to put bigger textures on a disc with more space. This is why BF3 has an extra disc for 360 owners.. so you can enjoy the high resolution textures ( if you care to load them... mostly meaning: if you have a 27 inch screen you might not notice much, but on a 60 inch like mine you definately will ) ...Either way Im buying this game. The space available on DVD- recently improved on the 360 .. Gears of War 3 was the first game to use the new XGD3 format and Epic still only needed to use 7.2 gigs for the longest Gears game....( they used 7.2 Gigs... but up to 7.95 gigs was possible with the new XB 360 format )... previous to this only 6.8 gigs has been available to developers... so the new format makes another GIG available.. Which is actually alot when you're already pushing the envelope..
If Bethesda can make a game a quality game of this caliber and stick it on one DVD it gives credit to the old saying that better graphics and more space alone don't equate to a better game... I think only Wii owners are gonna feel left out on this one..
