sapphi_snake on 12 November 2011
DélioPT said:
sapphi_snake said:
DélioPT said:
It`s in the nature of a sin to be harmful, otherwise it wouldn`t be a sin.
|
Circular logic (again surprisingly), and I think you may have thrown in a tautology too.
|
Actually, i only made the comment on the fact that something was harmful and gave a reason why it was harmful. I didn`t base that reason on what i said before. The reason is already known and implicit: being outside of God.
What i did later was make explicit it once more what consequence resulted from a sin and made a simple (common sense) comment about that aspect of a sin.
Basically: a sin harms people. Or you can say it backwards, like you did: a given action harms people because it is a sin.
I wasn`t the one what joined together both ways to view a situation. You were the one.
|
That's not a reason. And if something beneficial is 'outside of god', then I don't think people should care much for what is 'of god'.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
