sapphi_snake said:
If the police had been informed, you can be sure that he would've seen them, he would've been questioned, and it would've been in the media. Sorry, he was knowingly playing dumb (unless he actualyl is extremely dumb, as in that blonde girl from Glee dumb). He got what he deserved. |
Why would he be interviewed? He is not a witness, or a suspect, and there is no reason to believe he had any knowledge of the crime outside of what he was told ...
What you don't seem to get is that Joe Paterno was (probably) fired for the same reason you're upset with this case in general; he was let go to protect the football program. He is an old man who was about to retire at the end of the season (6 weeks away), the college has already lined-up a replacement, and letting him go would be the quickest way to generate a resolution which took this story out of the news. He was (most likely) given a massive severance to keep quiet and, due to his age, it is likely that he won't be around long enough to testify in trial about his part in this ...
Without his side of the story the athletic director can say (pretty much) whatever he wants about what and when he was informed of the incident and probably avoid any consequences for covering it up; and the witness coach can remain on staff, and the coaching line-up will remain exactly how it would for next season.







