| sapphi_snake said: @padib: What it means, practically, is that men are to be the strength of a family. Men are the stronger sex. If a man is weak, let him work on his physical attributes. If a man lacks confidence, let him work on it. A man, is to be... well... a MAN. That is his place. He is to be strong, protector, leading and giving. Really? And who are you to say that? Women are also to be confident and strong, but in a supportive role. That is their strength. Says who? I have a feeling you've never met a woman before. To comfort, to remind, to help, to lead in thought, but in a way that complements the MAN. It doesn't in any way make her less important. So the men get the glory and the women 'help'? Yes, this is certainly 'equality'. Men and women ARE equal. It means that, in a general assembly, let the men talk. If the women want to play a part, let them talk to their husbands at home. Do you even know what the term 'equality' means? You can't have two captains, and that's what's ruining everything. You don't need two captains. Women can be leaders, and men can follow. Oh, that probably doesn't go well with your sexist archaic worldview. I am an employee where I work, I have my place. It doesn't make me less important than my boss in any way, for all I know I'm probably better at my job than he'll ever be. This is such a bad example. I wonder if you realize how stupid it simply is. You are aware than in a corporation you can move up in the hierarchy, no? And this, right here, is why so many women have come into rebellion. No, women rebelled because they were tired of being told what 'their place' was, by people like you. Is this a picture you think is bad to live with? Bite me. I do not want to live in that world. It sounds terrible. And I wouldn't touch you with a stick. |
Wow padib, I didn't see the post he was replying to. If I did I would of just ignored you. And you call Runa the bigot. I'm ignoring you now, padib.
