By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The_Joker_Product on 10 November 2011
Edit Thread
crissindahouse said:

lol wow man i don't even have a wii i only have ps3 and 360 but to say smg is no match to a game like rdr/uncharted/whatever is just ridiculous. if you don't see how perfect smg is for a jump and rund then it's your problem but don't try to say it's a fact.

graphics and sound aren't good? wtf it's a wii you know that right? just because the console can't have graphics like ps3 or 360 can have doesn't mean the graphics are not as good.

if you come with that i would have to say every console game is shit because my battlefield 3 on my pc look s just brilliant.

or what's the problem some have with zelda? yeah you always do the same but for example what can you do in uncharted? you can climb and shoot. it's always the same climbing which is not even a challenge drake does almost everything by himself you just have to push a button and climb in the right direction. the shooting sequences are not really the best the genre has seen but it's still a great game i would give 93%

but zelda makes everything better than it's competition. mario makes everything better than it's competition. why do you even compare uncharted with mario? and if i would put mario in uncharted it wouldn't get the same score as well haha

 

€dit: asriel explained it perfectly. story is just not what you play mario for. it's the same like i would never play uncharted for the shooting sequences because i don't really like them in this game. i play it for the nice landscape and the story/acting. if you guys need a great story ok then mario isn't for you but you just can't say because you need a perfect story that everyone has to need a great story and a game can't be great without that.

 

Thats the thing, its just jump and run, thats all you've done in these games since the first one, Little Big Planet had jump and run, but unlike Galaxy it allowed anyone to create their own levels to the extent of their imagination, the levels some of the people have made far exceed the official levels in the game. Theres literally millions of levels and never ending content.

The sequel introduced racing and other things, yet those games get a metacritic of 95 and 92. Whereas Mario can magically get a 97, but its only because its Mario.

Graphics are fine for a Wii game but still inferior to PS3/Xbox, not its fault but anothe reason why its no match. Musics also fine its that the characters dont talk and mumble out some childish babble instead.

Even if people dont play the games for the story they still have one, and everyone one is the same, they cant change it up even a little bit. A game that just involves you running around and jumping like in all the previous games should not get a 97. That 97 is higher than every single PS3 or Xbox game except for GTAIV which its reviews were paid for anyway.