| NiKKoM said: Yes you are... |
How would it be a sick game? I don't follow considering the recent account it wasn't an assassination and the operation was carried out very well.
Also all war games anger their supporters. Game developers create games where we call the Chinese Chinks and the Japs names. We brutally slaughter them in combat. Even in ModernWarFare and other fictional war games we attack countries all the time killing people who the rest of the world love and support.
Whats worse about this game and the many other war games which pit American or allied forces against the forces of other countries? The killing of Hitler isn't seen as sick and is portrayed in video games. What makes Osama so much different then any other war villian killed in any other game?
I don't see how we should censor what happened to Bin Laden an evil tyrant who ended thousands of lives and started the biggest war since WWII. Also Al Qaida isn't going to kill any more people because of the release of this game then they would without it, who they target may differ but all evidence shows they are attacking civilians and troops every chance they get. Avoiding further angering them isn't going to lower the amount of casualties or stop their acts of terror.
P.S a lot of the Middle East and the rest of the globe would love to know the truth and that he was not assassinated in cold blood. I am pretty sure their would be a huge market for a game or even film that aimed to give the consumers the truth. Its hardly sick considering the content Activision or EA or any other publisher has put in their war games!
-JC7
"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer







