sapphi_snake said:
Rath said:
sapphi_snake said:
Rath said: I don't see the problem? He may be the biological father of these children but in every practical sense he is not the father - he just helped people who could not normally have children. It's not like he slept around and got a whole bunch of chicks pregnant. |
The problem is that there is a chance that his children could end up engaging in incestous relations. The sperm clinic behaved highly unethical by allowing so many women to use his sperm (or allowing him to donate so much sperm in the first place). it's really not good for so many people to share the same father.
He's also obviously not very smart, as he's liable to pay child support to the underage children.
|
I am almost certain that sperm donors are not liable for child support.
|
Yep, they are. Heck, we've had several threads regarding that issue on this very site.
|
Anonymous sperm donors with no connection to the child are not liable, the cases where liability was found the donor was either not anonymous or had played a role in the child's life that made him more than just a mere donor.