jneul said:
|
It affects people's views when those same people are easily led by the reviewers. I know this happens in every entertainement medium, but that's why people need to be critical about what they read and not over-react when it's an unfavourable and contrary view from what they were expecting.
Again, in the end, it's all about the consumer's experience. That's what defines the success of any entertainement medium. Not the critics, not the individuals that have some kind of agenda regarding a certain product, be it positive or negative, not the producers or the company that produces the item. Consumer's and their own individual experience is the defining thing and should be the most important measuring stick in any medium.
If people took all the reviews they read with a grain of salt (and not just the negative ones, the positive ones also deeply influenciate people's views as badly as negative ones do, yet you only see this kind of backlash mostly for negative reviews) and think with their own heads ("should I get this game because it fits my tastes?", "did I enjoy the previous games?", "will it be a good experience, considering my own expectations and not anybody elses?") then little by little, all the agenda-filled, hit-snatching "reviews" (both super positive or super negative and those that have literally no worthwhile content) would simply dissapear due to the consumer being wary of them.
Current PC Build
CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"