IamAwsome said:
oniyide said:
lestatdark said:
oniyide said:
lestatdark said:
oniyide said:
disolitude said:
Mr Khan said:
I really don't see why it won't, unless they're skimping on the graphics card to the point where they can do no more than emulate the Wii in its native resolution
I mean, i know what they've said, but all these things are fluid at the end of the day, though i also don't understand why my Wii doesn't have an ethernet port, and why the Wii U apparently won't either...
Anyway, i quite liked Colors, but i'm rather bitter about Generations not being on Wii. I'll pick it up on 3DS eventually. Maybe when i get back from Japan...
|
There are rumblings of Generations coming to WiiU though ;)
|
Rumblings??! I bet my bottom dollar that it will be out for WIi U, just like that crap Sonic 06 was ported from 360 just in time for PS3 release.
OT the cycle ended for me with All Stars Racing, it actually was quite good, hell even the online was decent. Colors is good, i still play it once in a while and Generations is just a better version of that. The 3DS versio will be fine, just like the rest of the portable ones. Except Rivals and that Bioware game
|
You shall not mention the Sonic Chronicles game any longer. Let that abomination die the painful and well deserved death it deserves 
|
Was it that bad?! I never played it myself, I always wanted to, but the reviews are too mixed across the board and i have to much RPGs i started and havent finished anyway
|
Let's just say that it's easily the worst game Bioware ever made and amongst the worst Sonics too. Yes, even worse than the crap Sonic Heroes. Plus, I've struggled to find a RPG that's easier than Sonic Chronicles...they could have saved us the pain of having to go through the badly animated battle scenes and just give us an instant win key.
|
Well i like Sonic Heroes, it was pretty much Adventure without all the stupid scavenger hunts and horrible 3rd person shooting sections. Worst Bioware game?? Even worse than DA 2? I find that hard to believe
|
IMO the problem with Sonic Heroes was that there was way too much of an emphasis on teamwork. The whole "I cound never do it without you guys" story was also irritating, and it would have been much better off without Big, Cream, and the Chaotix. With all of the teamwork mechanics, and somewhat simplified story, it seems like they tried to appeal to non-Sonic gamers, and they ended up alienating their core fanbase in the process.
|
Here's the thing though, you DONT have to play with those characters. at all. You could stick to Sonic, Tails and Knuckles and it would be the same game. The whole team dynamic was just Sega's way of covering up that each team represented an actual difficulty level. Sonic &co was medium, Shadow & CO. was the hardest, Amy & CO was the easiest. Chaotix was some kind of weird scavenger hunt crap and it wasnt that bad to me. At least i wasnt wrestling with the stupid camera. They all played the same. Constrast that to SA 1 where you had to to play as everyone to see the "real" ending. Tails was alright, Knuckles was meh and the other 3 sucked. SA2 actual made it worst, where you HAD to play as someone other than Sonic to progress. Did you really enjoy Knuckles, Rouge, Eggman, and Tails' sections?? I didnt, I hated it. I agree that the story blew, but im not playing Sonic for story. I want half way decent Sonic stories, Archie does a pretty good job.
