RolStoppable said:
I think you are completely wrong on what the word "REAL" means in the context of this thread. The context makes it pretty clear that it is about what a main series Mario game is and what isn't. Your argument has reached a dead end, because it missed the point of this thread. Now it's my turn to ask you a question. What makes you think that Super Mario 64 and its sequels are main series Mario games? |
My argument still adheres strictly to the point of this thread, which is the definition of a "real" Mario game. But my argument boils down to this: you absolutely cannot satisfactorily qualify your reason for choosing console-based 2-D Mario platformers as the "real" Mario games. You have not done it yet. I defy you to do it.
To your question:
I never said they were.