mantlepiecek said:
Shinobi-san said:
mantlepiecek said:
pezus said:
It's funny that Eurogamer always downplays disadvantages in the 360 version of games, but blows it out of proportion when the PS3 lacks something/is worse. If you read the comments there, I think a lot of the users have noticed it too |
They were worse before. They have improved a lot imo over the time and are pretty fair nowadays. For eg they didn't pick on GT 5 that much in the forza comparison where they could have picked a lot of unnecessary flaws in that game.
They have started to overall not make a huge fuss over the small differences in the multiplatform games nowadays.
|
if you finding bias in a digital foundry article then well....i dunno. There articles are about as non bias as you can get when you comparing multiplat games. I find their articles to be well written and almost entirely from a "factual" point of view, very seldom they add their own opinions. In fact way too much times, they give the ps3 the benefit of the doubt when its usually the inferior version.
Compare these guys to lens of truth who are blatantly PS3 bias... huge difference.
|
The info has always been non-biased. Its the writing and the results people talk about. People who have been reading their articles since the last couple of years know what pezus is talking about.
I also think you might have quoted the wrong person? Not sure.
|
hmm i felt my response was to the both of you guys...i mean you both implied DF has some 360 bias.
Ive been reading DF for a long time now, well pretty much ever since they started out i guess..and ive never felt they were bias to 360. Most multiplat games, the 360 would get the approval over ps3...thats true, but it was always justified. But really thats saying more about the quality of ps3 versions a year or two back. And the only thing thats changed of late is that developers are not as shit as they use to be with ps3 development.
