Kasz216 on 30 October 2011
| megaman79 said: There was no justification to invade a country in order to attack a non-state entity. Of course we should leave. Practically speaking, well it hasn't exactly helped anyone but the oil barrons (Shell, BP, Exxon, in addition to the Saudi Oil Field owners) to threaten the oil supply. Were still paying way too much for the stuff. The mention of democracy, and state rebuilding, is only relevant because the media monopoly tells you it is. Its really not. |
You do know that Afganhistan basically has no real oil reserves right?
I mean, the closest "Oil" connection I could even imagine is that someone wanted to build a pipeline through afghanistan, though most oil companies wanted to pass because they saw it as more costly and in general pointless when compaired to just exporting via the caspian sea.
